Photo enforcement
Post a comment (Requires free registration)
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Question of the week
Do you think the community should be involved with the selectioin of a new School Board Superintendent?
Advertisement
18 February 2010 at 7:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
patrandall (Pat Randall) says…
Shovelhead,
Time for you to read.
Go to SB 1443 and read the changes being discussed on photo traffic enforcement.
18 February 2010 at 8:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Shovelhead (Mike McLaughlin) says…
What are you looking for, anything in particular?
One thing I noticed 28-1206. Suspension or revocation of license; photo enforcement systems
“…the department shall not consider the violation for the purpose of determining whether the person's driver license should be suspended or revoked. ”
Now if Photo radar is about safety why is this section in place? Why aren't these safety risk repeat offenders taken off the streets?
If the program isn't revenue generated why is it that repeat offenders aren't stripped of their licenses?
18 February 2010 at 8:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
patrandall (Pat Randall) says…
Not looking for anything. I was bored so read it.
What a bunch of crap.. No wonder they stay in session so long.
18 February 2010 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Shovelhead (Mike McLaughlin) says…
Maybe Payson needs photo radar to help out with the budget crunch.
OOPS, forgot, it's a safety program.
It just seems to be a safety program that allows repeat offenders to continue to offend :)