It Is Time For A Change

Advertisement

Editor:

In response to the letter from Ed Welge whom we all know as a retired engineer and a current front man for the petro chemical industry, I say, yes, Mr. Welge, it is time for a change.

However, given your stated lack of concern for our environment over the years in many of your letters and your belief that our dependence on, and use of, petroleum oil is not part of the reason we are experiencing climate change, coupled with your belief that any problem related to drilling for petroleum can be solved by a really good engineer, I doubt that you and I are going to agree on what that change should be.

So, having heard your point of view, as in “drill baby, drill” I feel a statement regarding a less harmful and more permanent solution to our unemployment, budget shortfalls, and energy needs should be expressed.

To that end, please consider this: sea level is rising, the ice caps are melting, and our air is about as polluted as we can handle and still have life on this planet, and all of this is directly related to the heavy use of petroleum worldwide, and, none of these problems will get any better until we start using energy produced by non-polluting sources. Therefore, I suggest that we not drill for oil anymore. How about instead we invest in clean and sustainable energy sources? By the way, petroleum is not a sustainable resource, it is a finite resource. When it is gone, it is gone forever, but, solar energy, wind energy, tidal energy and bio-gas energy will be with us to infinity, and, unlike petroleum, they are all clean energy.

I surmise by your letters that you actually believe that more oil can be produced without causing severe and potentially irreparable environmental damage, so I ask that you simply look at the events of the recent past before you expound on the topic further, and I cite the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as only one example of engineering failure, coupled of course with corporate greed, which has wreaked havoc on the environment of the gulf region and beyond, and will continue to do so for the next 200 years, or longer.

Just imagine what harm a similar spill like the gulf spill would cause in a pristine place like, say, the ANWAR region of Alaska.

I know, you want to drill there too, and you’re willing to take the risk, because after all, you are an engineer and you think you can do it, but, what about the rest of us who prefer that ANWAR remains in the condition it is in now and are not willing to take that risk? Do we not count in the overall scheme of things? Or do ever increasing corporate profits for the oil companies matter more?

Now, if it were not for the fact that you promote more drilling through your letters I would find them quite amusing, however, the mindset that brought on the gulf oil spill is apparently also your mindset, and I find that thought process disturbing.

If you really want to help, if you really want to see more jobs available and a strong economy as a result, not to mention a cleaner, safer, healthier planet, why do you not use your talents as an engineer to figure out how to harness and use natural energy and help get planet earth off its oil addiction?

I’ll bet you are up to the challenge.

Jim Estess

Pine

Comments

Tom Nye 3 years, 2 months ago

Another global warming bafoon speaks out. I'll bet you idolize Al Gore ha? Planet earth has an oil addiction?? The earth produced the oil bone head!! Wind turbines create toxic chemicals that leak into the ground and thus into our water tables, wind turbines KILL tens of thousands of birds a year, did you know that Mr. Estess. wake up and smell the oil Mr Estess, man made global warming is the biggest FRAUD ever perpatrated on mankind.

0

Ted Paulk 3 years, 2 months ago

I was totally taken off guard by Mr. Estess' letter in Tuesday's Roundup. After suffering through Mr. Welge's ramblings that the paper continues to print for some unknown reason; great leader, anointed one, etc, I had no idea that the man had an education beyond the eighth grade. Maybe I got him confused with Mr. Nye? "Bafoon"?.

0

don evans 3 years, 2 months ago

Take another drag Mr. Nye. Your bogus global warming mantra is the biggest ponzi scheme yet devised. I'll bet money you'll be promoting marijuana consumption as a way to save the planet.

0

Dan Varnes 3 years, 1 month ago

It's so very sad to see someone clinging to "facts" that aren't really facts at all. In this age of internet availability, there is no excuse for trying to pass off poor information as truth, which is exactly what Mr. Estess attempted to do in his letter to the editor.

QUOTE: "...please consider this: sea level is rising..."

Incorrect. Sea level is NOT rising. Statistics certainly do not show this to be true.

"Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5067351/Rise-of-sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html

QUOTE: "...the ice caps are melting,"

Incorrect. Using data and measurements, science has now shown that the ice caps and glaciers in many parts of the globe are GROWING, not shrinking. Want to see for yourself? Take a trip to the Shasta-Trinity region in CA. Mt. Shasta and farther north, Mt. St Helen's are both showing LARGER ice areas over the last few years. Why doesn't Mr. Estess know about this?

70 Trillion cubic feet of New Arctic Ice: http://globalrumblings.blogspot.com/2011/01/70-trillion-cubic-feet-of-new-arctic.html

QUOTE: "...and our air is about as polluted as we can handle and still have life on this planet,"

WRONG. The only air pollution at those extreme levels is in the basin areas (China, Russia) with heavy industry and manufacturing. Air pollution can certainly be a localized problem, as it has since the dawn of the industrial revolution, but why would any informed person try to pretend that our entire planet is a toxic mess and can only be "fixed" by massive taxation, heavy government involvement and a drastic curtailment in our high standard of living?

Mr. Estess seems to only be looking at life through a very, very narrow window. Unfortunately, it also appears that he's been seeing an unscientific and patently false view of reality. This is unacceptable, when real information and measurements are so easily found by just doing even the slightest bit of investigation one's home computer.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.