Ban Gun Free Zones



The unconstitutional, anti-Second Amendment, anti-gun rhetoric from the left continues to escalate as Obama and his Leftist Communist Democrat thugs try to intimidate the American people to cave to his illegal gun grabs.

We have the “president” trotting out Sandy Hook parent campaign “props” as he always does, wasting another $1 million-plus of taxpayer money to fly them to D.C. on AF 1 to try to scam the sympathy of the people.

We have senators lying that we need these illegal gun grabs to “protect the children.”

Not one of the proposed unconstitutional gun control laws would do anything to prevent another Newtown or any other mass shooting.

The only way to stop this madness is to allow concealed carry and ban gun free zones. Those two steps alone would have eliminated most of the shooting deaths as almost all mass shootings occur in gun free zones by nutcases whose non-parenting “parents” drug them with Ritalin and use violent video games as babysitters. The non-“parents” of these losers must be tried as accessories to their kids’ crimes and convicted accordingly.

The only other mass shooting was in a gun free zone at Ft. Hood. It was committed by a Muslim terrorist, and the Muslim Obama regime still calls it “workplace violence.”

Chicago and D.C. have the strictest gun control laws in the country, and the highest gun crime rates. Kennesaw, Ga. has mandatory carry for heads of households and a zero gun crime rate!

Any questions?

Dale Oestmann


Nancy Volz 3 years, 8 months ago

Well, here (below) is one untruth in your letter rebutted. That is untrue also. Kennesaw law reads: Sec. 34-21. - Heads of households to maintain firearms.permanent link to this piece of content


In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore.


Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.

(Ord. No. 2009-03, Exh. A, 2-16-09)

So, it is NOT mandatory "carry" - it is mandatory "have one on hand if your beliefs allow you to do so."

Well, two: President Obama is not Muslim regardless of what you want to believe. Or what you want others to believe.


Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.