Input On Editorial Policy



You asked for input concerning editorial policy in regard to letters to the editor. Here are my thoughts:

• The First Amendment does not guarantee a right to publication or public proclamations without reasonable restrictions. Libel, defamation and creating hysteria come to mind. Therefore, some rational and reasonable filters are entirely appropriate when creating a public forum. Intent as well as content can be examined and considered. As long as alternate sides of an issue are represented fairly, these guidelines can and should be administered. A rant, for example, containing primarily derogatory attacks or obviously incorrect or misleading information, is not an appropriate communication and is fair game to be disallowed. Begin each column with a brief statement of the limits.

• Poorly written letters, even those with obvious problems with grammar or construction, are completely allowable as long as they fit the guidelines above. A constructive point of view should not be restricted by having to meet certain mechanical requirements.

• Contemporary and community issues should be given preference and this policy made clear.

• It’s your bulletin board. If you feel you are being fair and balanced, and if the intent is to be open and informative, and if you can look yourself in the mirror each day, just do your best and don’t apologize.

Noble Collins


don evans 2 years ago

Seems to me Mr. Collins has had several "rants posted in the recent past". But then his suggested guidelines are not to apply to him, only us unedumated.


Donald Cline 2 years ago

Ah, Don Evans beat me to it. I was going to point out that our resident-leftist Mr. Noble Collins should be careful what he wishes for; if his rule was uniformly applied he would never have another letter published.


Nancy Volz 1 year, 12 months ago

I find Mr. Collins' letters thoughtful on the various topics. Rants? Not at all.


Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.