Sunday March 1, 2015
Jump to content
You are indeed a low-information voter, Ted. The Republicans were vocally opposed to it, but it was the Obama crew that wanted it, and today they got it.
Oh, I failed to answer your question "What have (I) done for (my) country and fellow Americans in my lifetime." Well, without revealing unnecessary personal details, I served in the military; I tried to escape the Federal Reserve Bank-caused recession in 1970 by moving to Australia only to find the recession was worse there because THEY were more communist that you are, Ted. In fact in the 1930's they thought Josef Stalin, the butcher of the Ukraine, was just the savior of all the "little people" who had to work for a living. So I came back with a brand new baby girl (my American fiancé followed me over there and we were married there) and I began studying everything I could find to explain why in heck America was more like Australia than America was supposed to be. It has been a long, hard slog, but I have been fighting for the liberties our founding principles were designed to preserve and protect ever since. You know, Ted, the "Rule of Law" instead of the "Rule of Man." The :"Consent of the Governed" instead of the "Divine Right of kings to govern." Or maybe you don't have a clue what I am talking about, steeped as you are in the philosophy of robbing everyone else blind at the point of government's gun because you have a ... "need." Well, our government was founded to establish once and for all the principle that man (and women) are important and powerful according to what they can produce for the improvement of society, not according to their "need." Your "need" does not compel specific performance from me. If I think you're a worthwhile person who needs a hand up but not a hand out, then my charity is available. But it is not available at the point of a gun, wielded by government or some other criminal marauder (but I repeat myself).
"No communists in Gila County"? What do you think you are, Ted? What do you think your sycophant Noble Collins is? Do you think you are a "Socialist"? Has anyone ever informed you that the only difference between Socialism and Communism is the armed revolution? That any Communist will tell you (if he thinks he is talking to another communist) that the only purpose of creating Socialism is to set the stage for the armed revolution? Seriously, Ted, you need to do some research and find out what you are spouting before you manage to achieve it: You won't like it even a little bit. (That is, unless you like the idea of moving up through the ranks as a mob enforcer, which is what a Marxist apparatchik becomes when he succeeds.) Oh, and "apparatchik" means the same think it meant in the 1930's and is intended to address the same kind of wannabe thug.
No, Ted. I don't know the Koch Bros., though I like what I have heard about them: SOMEONE needs to support the fight against cultural Marxism you and your sycophants are advocating. No, Ted, I am speaking like a person who knows history well enough to know that what you seek for a government has never survived in the history of the planet without being supported by other nations who pay for their slave labor. What you want is for the Incompetents in Society to hold the Competents to ransom, while despising them, restricting them, preventing them from producing the innovations, the inventions, the better standards of living, the wider choice of products to buy. You would like nothing better than to lock up every capitalist CEO behind barbed wire and order him (or her) to produce OR ELSE.
You are a classic example of the doofus who carved up the goose that laid the golden eggs because he thought the goose was withholding what was rightfully his.
And when they do, they will vote for the "person" who promises to raid the public treasury into bankruptcy to pay for every "pre-existing condition," cancer, Alzheimer's, autism, and hangnail that can be created for the purpose of sucking the federal and State Treasuries dry. That is exactly what you would do, isn't it, Mr. Spatti?
Some of us "pompous folks" don't have health insurance either, Ted. But we don't go around claiming that other people have to be held to ransom to pay for our health insurance. In fact, if you are receiving health insurance courtesy of the illegal, unconstitutional ObamaCare, you ARE sucking "on the government's tit." Sorry for your wife's condition, Ted, but it doesn't give you the right to hold hard-working people to ransom when they didn't have any responsibility for putting her in that condition.
Not intelligent enough or perceptive enough to make our heads explode, Ted. Just more cultural Marxist blatherings to a readership that mostly doesn't pay attention any more. One thing you have to say for Brenda Barton; she believes in the U.S. and the State of Arizona Constitutions, and that one thing alone makes up for whatever fault you or your sycophant Noble claims she has even if there were facts to back up the claim.
We are a Christian nation, Meria, but we give Christian charity by choice, not at the point of a gun held by a Communist apparatchik who has played his guilt-trip con-game on the ignorami who don't know where wealth and jobs come from. Newsflash: Wealth and jobs are not created by societal leeches, nor by the "useful idiots" of the communists who advocate their con-games in letters to the editor. Both are created by producers and workers, and the benefit is better and cheaper medical care for the poor, and fewer poor instead or professional welfare recipients (not to mention alien criminals who have no business being here in the first place). Why should anyone work for a living when conmen can advocate supporting them by robbing those who produce?
Ah, Raymond Spatti and Ted Paulk, reinforcing each other's status as looters of a productive society, who would rather destroy production and the creation of wealth, which allows the poor to have jobs and the wherewithal to better themselves by education and good work ethics, in favor of destroying productivity and establishing "need" as the criteria for receiving income rather than ability or willingness to work and hold down a job. The fundamental principle of the Communist Party: "From each according to his ability" (extracted from each at the point of a gun or threat of work camps, of course), "and to each according to his need" ("need" being elevated to a level of superiority well above the rights of the working man and woman to keep what they earn and be generous to whom THEY consider worthy of their assistance, rather than allowing some Party apparatchik to decide who receives what and who works at slave labor where to pay for it.
Freaking communists make me sick, and deserve every insult and vilification Ted Paulk, knowing the reality of this con-game he and Raymond Spatti are demanding our politicians impose upon us, rightfully expects. Guilty conscience, Ted? If it isn't, it should be.
You know, Ted, you are living proof that he who doesn't understand history is doomed to repeat it. In fact, you might be living proof that he who doesn't understand the present is doomed to repeat it. I wonder, frankly, if you understand anything at all.
Of COURSE the stock market is setting records. It is denominated in fiat currency made out of paper and based upon debt, isn't it? Thanks to your enemy agent messiah infesting our White House, and his Marxist sycophants infesting the majority of our U.S. Senate, and their insistence on pumping tons of worthless paper into the economy, if you divide the current stock market "record high" by, say 1281 -- which is the current spot price of 1 oz. of gold, you find the stock market record high is about 11 oz. of gold. If you multiply that by twenty, which is the number of "real dollars" one oz. of gold is worth, you find the stock market high in real dollars is only $220. On October 29th, 1929, Ted, the day of the worst crash in market history, the Dow closed at $230.07. Honestly, Ted, maybe you should listen to someone who knows exactly what he is talking about, like Rep. Dr. Paul Gosar.
Yeah, gas is at an all time low -- and union wages are at an all time high, and the oil companies are laying off personnel because they can't pay union-inflated wages. What do you think that is going to do to the economy as soon as those employees can't pay their rent or groceries? Oh, that's right -- you think your enemy agent messiah is going to wave his pen and phone around and make it all better,l don't you?
Yeah, the president wants to raise taxes on the middle class, Ted; that's not Paul Gosar saying that: It is your enemy agent messiah saying that. And there goes whatever gains in disposable income might otherwise be had from lower transportation costs of products, leaving nothing for middle class businesses to hire more employees with. Do you have a clue about cause and effect, Ted?
Yeah, the richest 85 people in America have more money that the rest of the country, except that they don't have it stuffed in a mattress somewhere; they have it invested in industry and entrepreneurship and EMPLOYEES, Ted: You know, those people like you who want jobs? The Koch Bros. and the Waltons produce more jobs than the rest of the country combined -- except perhaps for government, which is rapidly overtaking the private sector for the number of jobs. Problem is, government doesn't produce anything and doesn't create wealth and doesn't expand the economy: All it does is expand make work and suck the people dry. Why in Heaven's name do you want bigger government, Ted? Is it just so you can get freebies produced by and stolen from everyone else?
Last login: Sunday, February 15, 2015