Friday April 18, 2014
Jump to content
Ever notice that the only ones who bring up the race card is the liberals. They do it in order to fan illogical negative emotions so they don't have to face reality or reason clearly. If you are white, a man, old, religious, carry a gun, and love traditional marriage you are automatically an ignorant, prejudiced, hate-monger. It doesn't matter what you say or do or who you really are. How sad that this is the case all over the country and beyond. Truly we are living in a Pro-death culture when we try to kill people even with words. When that begins to happen to a country, it rots, morally and economically. How far we have come and what a brave new world we live in. Sure hope you are satisfied, Mr. Paulk.
Yes, Mr. Paulk, ignorance is bliss. Too bad one never recognizes it in oneself.
If only you would stop writing and the other "progressives" as well. We might actually be able to save our country from the moral and economic rot you've helped usher in. I'll keep praying.
Nothing like changing the subject and focusing the issue back on me in order to avoid unpleasant realities, but you are right and I apologize. I thought I had added Mrs., but I didn't peruse my letter afterward like I normally do.
I sure wish you were as concerned about child killing (abortion) and the destruction of families (homosexual unions) as you are with manners.
After all the rhetoric and hyperbola, there is only one question to be asked. Is abortion the deliberate killing of a human being? If it is (and science proves it), then the law now says we can kill a whole segment of society without thought or compassion. If abortion is not the deliberate killing of a human being, then once again we have to ask, "What is it?" All other dialogue hinges on that one question because if people are not guaranteed the right to life then all other rights will become forfeit as well. And that is exactly what is happening.
Just to add a few things to the silly Paulk statement that we do not want to help women and their babies. There are literally thousands of pregnancy centers and half-way houses for women all over the US that are primarily run by Christians on a shoe-string budget. Tens of thousands of volunteers contribute time, talent, and money to keep them active. The Paulks of this world do not bother to look into these facts let alone help these women out. Lefties like Mayor Bloomberg of NY continually try to shut them down with numerous unfounded and anger-driven allegations, yet they survive because of their integrity and Christianity's love and compassion for all God's children. It may also interest you to know that the vast majority of these safe havens are run by women. It has also been found that more than 70% of the active leaders in the Pro-life movement are women. I don't suppose Paulk can explain that.
One of the oddest things about liberals is that they call us intolerant haters, Nazis, etc. Yet we are the ones trying to save women and babies while they completely ignore any good will and condone and/or participate in the killing of children. Who are the haters here? Who are the ones without compassion? If Paulk and his buddies would get their heads out of the sand and really investigate they would easily see the truth all around them. Knowing the Paulks, Bloombergs, and Obamas of this world, that is not going to happen.
Oh, I forgot to address Volz's illogic. How can anyone "come to the table" and change the conversation about killing human beings? How can having yourself mutilated (sterilization) be a sensible solution? How can killing the child before it is born be better than "a boyfriend or other party" killing him/her after they are born? How can using a human pesticide (contraceptive) that attacks a human's normal bodily functions and can cause an early abortion be a valid and agreed upon talking point in any conversation? If you think you can answer these questions reasonably, logically, and compassionately, then I have some ocean front property here in Arizona I'd like to sell you. The conversation has to start with the unequivocal and constitutional "Right to Life" before any progress could be made. Since liberals have no idea what the Right to Life entails, there will never be an agreement or consensus. One thing is sure. Sooner or later Pro-life will win over Pro-death because we are fighting to save lives and liberals are fighting to save a selfish choice that kills kids.
Just wait. Paulk's kind of self-righteous gloating and thoughtless name-calling will turn to unbelieving shock as the next 4 years unfold. As we have seen, and Paulk confirms it, liberals have tunnel vision when it comes to looking at things from all angles. If she had done any kind of research she would have seen the many rights that are in danger by Obama's actions. But it's like talking to a wall. You see, we conservatives check out every side. We listen to Rush but we also listen to what Chris Matthews has to say. We watch Fox News and the lame-steam CNN and NBC. We listen to what science has to say and still find time to go to church to find wisdom and peace. Then we carefully and prayerfully look behind the rhetoric and find the truth. Liberals, on the other hand, would have nervous breakdowns if they tried to weigh both sides. Can you imagine a liberal actually trying to find the truth rather than relying on sheer blind emotion and glandular satisfaction. Impossible. All I can say is, "Wait for the results." But don't worry. I won't pridefully and without compassion say "I told you so," and call you names as our country tanks with a socialist community organizer in charge. I will be trying to unselfishly save your keister from your own uninformed voting and horrible decisions and try to help restore sanity and true freedom again to this once great nation. What will the liberals be doing? Blaming Bush. What else?
Yep. Definitely what we are up against. If Collins is a gentleman then I am a Democrat. If Paulk is a reasonable, logical person then I am a liberal. By the way Paulk, if you are going to accuse us of something at least look it up in the dictionary. There's no such thing as a miscoginystic anything. The word you are searching for which is completely unfounded is misogynistic. And if you can't write or speak about us "radical haters without using obscenities" then you shouldn't be joining the conversation. Makes me wonder who is really the radical hater here.
The "facts" only the delusional call facts. Too bad there isn't a psychologist in the Democrat building. Then maybe we'd hear something logical and/or rational from them.
Then why would you say something blatantly untrue before you check the facts? If you aren't brainwashed then what would you call it?
Last login: yesterday