Disagree with two letter writers


Two letters to the editor in last Friday’s Roundup got my attention.

The first tried to make the argument that Payson should remain a “pass through” town rather than a “destination” and that anyone suggesting otherwise is a “charlatan” trying to “sucker” the townspeople into some unreasonable proposal.

I think that people trying to improve the economic viability of our town by getting more people to stop and eat in our restaurants, stay in our hotels, and shop at our grocery stores do not fit that characterization.

I believe that efforts to try to attract a branch of a major university or an elite prep school to our community, to improve the rodeo grounds, or to make Main Street more of a destination are equally honorable in their intentions.

I suggest that we get over the name-calling and simply work together to help our community prosper. The second letter was even more off base ... trying to credit our current president with the success of the United States in addressing carbon emissions. The latter writer needs to get a clue on reality.

Robert Hershberger, Payson

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Avoid obscene, hateful, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful.
Be Nice. No name-calling, racism, sexism or any sort of -ism degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article. Real names only!